http://panchayatwiki.lsgkerala.gov.in/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Panchayat%3ARepo18%2FLaw_Manual_Page0308 2026-04-19T14:45:36Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.40.1 http://panchayatwiki.lsgkerala.gov.in/index.php?title=Panchayat:Repo18/Law_Manual_Page0308&diff=8885&oldid=prev 2019-01-24T07:16:34Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 07:16, 24 January 2019</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l17">Line 17:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 17:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The provisions of the Act and the D &amp; O Rules stand by themselves and those provisions are not</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The provisions of the Act and the D &amp; O Rules stand by themselves and those provisions are not</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">{{create}}</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Sajithomas http://panchayatwiki.lsgkerala.gov.in/index.php?title=Panchayat:Repo18/Law_Manual_Page0308&diff=8881&oldid=prev 2019-01-24T07:15:32Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 07:15, 24 January 2019</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l15">Line 15:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 15:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::Establishment permit -- Objection on ground of density of population -- Held, if there has to be a valid finding that industry is objectionable on account of density of population in the neighbourhood, then, District Medical Officer ought to have taken such a view. Opinion of Panchayat Sub Committee is irrelevant, unless it is constituted with expert bodies nor have they taken the assistance of any experts in the field, If, after establishing the Unit, any pollution is caused, it is always open for the Panchayat or the Kerala State Pollution Control Board, as the case may be, to take appropriate preventive measures or even revoke or suspend the licence if there is noncompliance of the statutory provisions. - Ramapuram Grama Panchayat v. St. Basil Industries India (P) Ltd. and Others - 2016 (3) KHC 118: 2016 (2) KLT 219. Action Council v. Benny Abraham, 2002 KHC 416; Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise v. Krishna Poduval, 2005 KHC 1914; Chandi Prasad v. Jagdish Prasad, 2004 KHC 1184; Deepak Kumar v State of Haryana, 2012 KHC 4150: Gem Granites v. Deputy Superintendent of Police. Singh v. Union of India and Others, 1979 KHC 591; Krishnan T. and Others v. State of Kerala, 2007 KHC 3367; Mool Shankar Singh v. Regional Manager, PNB and Another, 2004 (9) SCC754; Municipal Corporation, Ahmedabad v. Jan Mohammed, 1986 KHC 796; Olga Tellis and Others v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, 1985 KHC 669; Panopharam y. Union of India, 2010 KHC 6221; Paul Industries (India) v. Union of India and Others, 2004 KHC 1954; State of Kerala v. Kondottyparambanmoosa, 2008 (3) KHC 733; Thomas Thomas v. Kottayam Municipality, 2008 (4) KHC 26; Referred to]</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>::Establishment permit -- Objection on ground of density of population -- Held, if there has to be a valid finding that industry is objectionable on account of density of population in the neighbourhood, then, District Medical Officer ought to have taken such a view. Opinion of Panchayat Sub Committee is irrelevant, unless it is constituted with expert bodies nor have they taken the assistance of any experts in the field, If, after establishing the Unit, any pollution is caused, it is always open for the Panchayat or the Kerala State Pollution Control Board, as the case may be, to take appropriate preventive measures or even revoke or suspend the licence if there is noncompliance of the statutory provisions. - Ramapuram Grama Panchayat v. St. Basil Industries India (P) Ltd. and Others - 2016 (3) KHC 118: 2016 (2) KLT 219. Action Council v. Benny Abraham, 2002 KHC 416; Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise v. Krishna Poduval, 2005 KHC 1914; Chandi Prasad v. Jagdish Prasad, 2004 KHC 1184; Deepak Kumar v State of Haryana, 2012 KHC 4150: Gem Granites v. Deputy Superintendent of Police. Singh v. Union of India and Others, 1979 KHC 591; Krishnan T. and Others v. State of Kerala, 2007 KHC 3367; Mool Shankar Singh v. Regional Manager, PNB and Another, 2004 (9) SCC754; Municipal Corporation, Ahmedabad v. Jan Mohammed, 1986 KHC 796; Olga Tellis and Others v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, 1985 KHC 669; Panopharam y. Union of India, 2010 KHC 6221; Paul Industries (India) v. Union of India and Others, 2004 KHC 1954; State of Kerala v. Kondottyparambanmoosa, 2008 (3) KHC 733; Thomas Thomas v. Kottayam Municipality, 2008 (4) KHC 26; Referred to]</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The provisions of the Act and the D &amp; O Rules stand by themselves and those provisions are not</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The provisions of the Act and the D &amp; O Rules stand by themselves and those provisions are not</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">previous foot note continued...</del></div></td><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-added"></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">(4) A Village Panchayat shall be competent to order the transfer of an abkari shop from one place to another within a period not exceeding fifteen days as may be specified in this behalf or to close the shop in the interest of public peace or morality or on grounds of expediency or nuisance. Explanation.— Abkari shop means a toddy shop or an arrack shop or a foreign liquor shop or a bar attached</del></div></td><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-added"></td></tr> </table>

Sajithomas http://panchayatwiki.lsgkerala.gov.in/index.php?title=Panchayat:Repo18/Law_Manual_Page0308&diff=8880&oldid=prev 2019-01-24T07:14:12Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 07:14, 24 January 2019</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l7">Line 7:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 7:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>{{center|NOTES}}</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>{{center|NOTES}}</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham the question of penalty in conducting a quarrying operation in the absence of licence was considered. The Court held that the penalty provided under a Statute takes in only contraventions of that Statute; unless otherwise specifically provided for, to be initiated and proceeded with by the Authorities authorised under that Statute. Authority under the Panchayat Raj Act, when proceeding for violation of that Act, cannot impose the penalty under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act. Absence of a D&amp;O Licence if proceeded with by the competent Authority under the KPR Act is compoundable under the Rules. – Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham - 2016 (5) KHC 893 : 2016 (4) KLT 422 : 2016 (4) KLJ 688.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham the question of penalty in conducting a quarrying operation in the absence of licence was considered. The Court held that the penalty provided under a Statute takes in only contraventions of that Statute; unless otherwise specifically provided for, to be initiated and proceeded with by the Authorities authorised under that Statute. Authority under the Panchayat Raj Act, when proceeding for violation of that Act, cannot impose the penalty under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act. Absence of a D&amp;O Licence if proceeded with by the competent Authority under the KPR Act is compoundable under the Rules. – Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham - 2016 (5) KHC 893 : 2016 (4) KLT 422 : 2016 (4) KLJ 688.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A laundry unit was closed for a while due to financial constraints and subsequently it was planned to revive it. In the instant case, it was held that when the unit has obtained certificate from the Pollution Control Board, permission for resumption of functioning can be given by Secretary for which licensee need not approach Panchayat Council again. - Soorya Retreats and Holidays India Private Limited and Another v. Elamadu Grama Panchayath and Another – 2016 (3) KHC 838.</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> </div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Establishment permit and licence - When all Authorities had confirmed that the Unit will not cause any environmental problems and that there would not be any pollution or nuisance to the people at large, provided it functions as per the conditions imposed by the said Authorities, then, it is not open for the Panchayat (in the absence of other expert materials) to take a different view and deny licence, overruling the findings of the Expert Authorities. – Ramapuram Grama Panchayat v. St. Basil Industries India (P) Ltd. and Others – 2016 (3) KHC 118: 2016 (2) KLT 219.95</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">::</ins>A laundry unit was closed for a while due to financial constraints and subsequently it was planned to revive it. In the instant case, it was held that when the unit has obtained certificate from the Pollution Control Board, permission for resumption of functioning can be given by Secretary for which licensee need not approach Panchayat Council again. - Soorya Retreats and Holidays India Private Limited and Another v. Elamadu Grama Panchayath and Another – 2016 (3) KHC 838.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In Action Council (supra), the Supreme Court had set aside the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court reported in Action Council v. Benny Abraham. - 2001 KHC 485 : 2001 (2) KLT 690 : 2001 (2) KLJ 120 : AIR 2002 Ker. 65. Supreme Court felt that four conditions ascribed by the Panchayat need not be interfered with. A perusal of para 11 of the Division Bench judgment of this Court would indicate that the main reason stated for rejecting the application for permit is that there was scarcity of water in the area and therefore it will not be possible to use sprinkler as directed by the Pollution Control Board during summer season and the agricultural properties might be adversely affected and it would include the members belonging to scheduled caste around the locality and there was a road around 100 metre of the premises. It is therefore clear that Action Council (supra) was decided on its own facts which is also clear from the judgment of the Supreme Court and cannot be treated as a binding precedent to form an opinion that in all cases such a view is to be taken. – Ramapuram Grama Panchayat v. St. Basil Industries India (P) Ltd. and Others – 2016 (3) KHC 118: 2016 (2) KLT 219.</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> </div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Establishment permit -- Objection on ground of density of population -- Held, if there has to be a valid finding that industry is objectionable on account of density of population in the neighbourhood, then, District Medical Officer ought to have taken such a view. Opinion of Panchayat Sub Committee is irrelevant, unless it is constituted with expert bodies nor have they taken the assistance of any experts in the field, If, after establishing the Unit, any pollution is caused, it is always open for the Panchayat or the Kerala State Pollution Control Board, as the case may be, to take appropriate preventive measures or even revoke or suspend the licence if there is noncompliance of the statutory provisions. - Ramapuram Grama Panchayat v. St. Basil Industries India (P) Ltd. and Others - 2016 (3) KHC 118: 2016 (2) KLT 219. Action Council v. Benny Abraham, 2002 KHC 416; Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise v. Krishna Poduval, 2005 KHC 1914; Chandi Prasad v. Jagdish Prasad, 2004 KHC 1184; Deepak Kumar v State of Haryana, 2012 KHC 4150: Gem Granites v. Deputy Superintendent of Police. Singh v. Union of India and Others, 1979 KHC 591; Krishnan T. and Others v. State of Kerala, 2007 KHC 3367; Mool Shankar Singh v. Regional Manager, PNB and Another, 2004 (9) SCC754; Municipal Corporation, Ahmedabad v. Jan Mohammed, 1986 KHC 796; Olga Tellis and Others v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, 1985 KHC 669; Panopharam y. Union of India, 2010 KHC 6221; Paul Industries (India) v. Union of India and Others, 2004 KHC 1954; State of Kerala v. Kondottyparambanmoosa, 2008 (3) KHC 733; Thomas Thomas v. Kottayam Municipality, 2008 (4) KHC 26; Referred to]</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">::</ins>Establishment permit and licence - When all Authorities had confirmed that the Unit will not cause any environmental problems and that there would not be any pollution or nuisance to the people at large, provided it functions as per the conditions imposed by the said Authorities, then, it is not open for the Panchayat (in the absence of other expert materials) to take a different view and deny licence, overruling the findings of the Expert Authorities. – Ramapuram Grama Panchayat v. St. Basil Industries India (P) Ltd. and Others – 2016 (3) KHC 118: 2016 (2) KLT 219.95</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> </div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">::</ins>In Action Council (supra), the Supreme Court had set aside the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court reported in Action Council v. Benny Abraham. - 2001 KHC 485 : 2001 (2) KLT 690 : 2001 (2) KLJ 120 : AIR 2002 Ker. 65. Supreme Court felt that four conditions ascribed by the Panchayat need not be interfered with. A perusal of para 11 of the Division Bench judgment of this Court would indicate that the main reason stated for rejecting the application for permit is that there was scarcity of water in the area and therefore it will not be possible to use sprinkler as directed by the Pollution Control Board during summer season and the agricultural properties might be adversely affected and it would include the members belonging to scheduled caste around the locality and there was a road around 100 metre of the premises. It is therefore clear that Action Council (supra) was decided on its own facts which is also clear from the judgment of the Supreme Court and cannot be treated as a binding precedent to form an opinion that in all cases such a view is to be taken. – Ramapuram Grama Panchayat v. St. Basil Industries India (P) Ltd. and Others – 2016 (3) KHC 118: 2016 (2) KLT 219.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> </div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">::</ins>Establishment permit -- Objection on ground of density of population -- Held, if there has to be a valid finding that industry is objectionable on account of density of population in the neighbourhood, then, District Medical Officer ought to have taken such a view. Opinion of Panchayat Sub Committee is irrelevant, unless it is constituted with expert bodies nor have they taken the assistance of any experts in the field, If, after establishing the Unit, any pollution is caused, it is always open for the Panchayat or the Kerala State Pollution Control Board, as the case may be, to take appropriate preventive measures or even revoke or suspend the licence if there is noncompliance of the statutory provisions. - Ramapuram Grama Panchayat v. St. Basil Industries India (P) Ltd. and Others - 2016 (3) KHC 118: 2016 (2) KLT 219. Action Council v. Benny Abraham, 2002 KHC 416; Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise v. Krishna Poduval, 2005 KHC 1914; Chandi Prasad v. Jagdish Prasad, 2004 KHC 1184; Deepak Kumar v State of Haryana, 2012 KHC 4150: Gem Granites v. Deputy Superintendent of Police. Singh v. Union of India and Others, 1979 KHC 591; Krishnan T. and Others v. State of Kerala, 2007 KHC 3367; Mool Shankar Singh v. Regional Manager, PNB and Another, 2004 (9) SCC754; Municipal Corporation, Ahmedabad v. Jan Mohammed, 1986 KHC 796; Olga Tellis and Others v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, 1985 KHC 669; Panopharam y. Union of India, 2010 KHC 6221; Paul Industries (India) v. Union of India and Others, 2004 KHC 1954; State of Kerala v. Kondottyparambanmoosa, 2008 (3) KHC 733; Thomas Thomas v. Kottayam Municipality, 2008 (4) KHC 26; Referred to]</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The provisions of the Act and the D &amp; O Rules stand by themselves and those provisions are not</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The provisions of the Act and the D &amp; O Rules stand by themselves and those provisions are not</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>previous foot note continued...</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>previous foot note continued...</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>(4) A Village Panchayat shall be competent to order the transfer of an abkari shop from one place to another within a period not exceeding fifteen days as may be specified in this behalf or to close the shop in the interest of public peace or morality or on grounds of expediency or nuisance. Explanation.— Abkari shop means a toddy shop or an arrack shop or a foreign liquor shop or a bar attached</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>(4) A Village Panchayat shall be competent to order the transfer of an abkari shop from one place to another within a period not exceeding fifteen days as may be specified in this behalf or to close the shop in the interest of public peace or morality or on grounds of expediency or nuisance. Explanation.— Abkari shop means a toddy shop or an arrack shop or a foreign liquor shop or a bar attached</div></td></tr> </table>

Sajithomas http://panchayatwiki.lsgkerala.gov.in/index.php?title=Panchayat:Repo18/Law_Manual_Page0308&diff=8844&oldid=prev 2019-01-24T07:00:03Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 07:00, 24 January 2019</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">{{right|</del>308<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">}}</del></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>308</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>{{center|</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>{{center|</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&#039;&#039;THE KERALA PANCHAYAT LAW MANUAL&#039;&#039;}}</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&#039;&#039;THE KERALA PANCHAYAT LAW MANUAL&#039;&#039;}}</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">{{right|</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Sec. 232}}</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Sec. 232}}</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">{{center|NOTES}}</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham the question of penalty in conducting a quarrying operation in the absence of licence was considered. The Court held that the penalty provided under a Statute takes in only contraventions of that Statute; unless otherwise specifically provided for, to be initiated and proceeded with by the Authorities authorised under that Statute. Authority under the Panchayat Raj Act, when proceeding for violation of that Act, cannot impose the penalty under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act. Absence of a D&amp;O Licence if proceeded with by the competent Authority under the KPR Act is compoundable under the Rules. – Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham - 2016 (5) KHC 893 : 2016 (4) KLT 422 : 2016 (4) KLJ 688.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham the question of penalty in conducting a quarrying operation in the absence of licence was considered. The Court held that the penalty provided under a Statute takes in only contraventions of that Statute; unless otherwise specifically provided for, to be initiated and proceeded with by the Authorities authorised under that Statute. Authority under the Panchayat Raj Act, when proceeding for violation of that Act, cannot impose the penalty under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act. Absence of a D&amp;O Licence if proceeded with by the competent Authority under the KPR Act is compoundable under the Rules. – Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham - 2016 (5) KHC 893 : 2016 (4) KLT 422 : 2016 (4) KLJ 688.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A laundry unit was closed for a while due to financial constraints and subsequently it was planned to revive it. In the instant case, it was held that when the unit has obtained certificate from the Pollution Control Board, permission for resumption of functioning can be given by Secretary for which licensee need not approach Panchayat Council again. - Soorya Retreats and Holidays India Private Limited and Another v. Elamadu Grama Panchayath and Another – 2016 (3) KHC 838.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A laundry unit was closed for a while due to financial constraints and subsequently it was planned to revive it. In the instant case, it was held that when the unit has obtained certificate from the Pollution Control Board, permission for resumption of functioning can be given by Secretary for which licensee need not approach Panchayat Council again. - Soorya Retreats and Holidays India Private Limited and Another v. Elamadu Grama Panchayath and Another – 2016 (3) KHC 838.</div></td></tr> </table>

Sajithomas http://panchayatwiki.lsgkerala.gov.in/index.php?title=Panchayat:Repo18/Law_Manual_Page0308&diff=8836&oldid=prev 2019-01-24T06:55:52Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 06:55, 24 January 2019</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>{{right|}}</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>{{right|<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">308</ins>}}</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>{{center|</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>{{center|</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&#039;&#039;THE KERALA PANCHAYAT LAW MANUAL&#039;&#039;}}</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&#039;&#039;THE KERALA PANCHAYAT LAW MANUAL&#039;&#039;}}</div></td></tr> </table>

Sajithomas http://panchayatwiki.lsgkerala.gov.in/index.php?title=Panchayat:Repo18/Law_Manual_Page0308&diff=8834&oldid=prev 2019-01-24T06:54:45Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 06:54, 24 January 2019</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">308</del></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">{{right|}}</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>{{center|</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>{{center|</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&#039;&#039;THE KERALA PANCHAYAT LAW MANUAL&#039;&#039;}}</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&#039;&#039;THE KERALA PANCHAYAT LAW MANUAL&#039;&#039;}}</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">{{right|</del></div></td><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-added"></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Sec. 232}}</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Sec. 232}}</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham the question of penalty in conducting a quarrying operation in the absence of licence was considered. The Court held that the penalty provided under a Statute takes in only contraventions of that Statute; unless otherwise specifically provided for, to be initiated and proceeded with by the Authorities authorised under that Statute. Authority under the Panchayat Raj Act, when proceeding for violation of that Act, cannot impose the penalty under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act. Absence of a D&amp;O Licence if proceeded with by the competent Authority under the KPR Act is compoundable under the Rules. – Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham - 2016 (5) KHC 893 : 2016 (4) KLT 422 : 2016 (4) KLJ 688.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham the question of penalty in conducting a quarrying operation in the absence of licence was considered. The Court held that the penalty provided under a Statute takes in only contraventions of that Statute; unless otherwise specifically provided for, to be initiated and proceeded with by the Authorities authorised under that Statute. Authority under the Panchayat Raj Act, when proceeding for violation of that Act, cannot impose the penalty under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act. Absence of a D&amp;O Licence if proceeded with by the competent Authority under the KPR Act is compoundable under the Rules. – Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham - 2016 (5) KHC 893 : 2016 (4) KLT 422 : 2016 (4) KLJ 688.</div></td></tr> </table>

Sajithomas http://panchayatwiki.lsgkerala.gov.in/index.php?title=Panchayat:Repo18/Law_Manual_Page0308&diff=8826&oldid=prev 2019-01-24T06:53:21Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 06:53, 24 January 2019</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>308</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>308</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>''THE KERALA PANCHAYAT LAW MANUAL''</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">{{center|</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Sec. 232</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>''THE KERALA PANCHAYAT LAW MANUAL''<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">}}</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">{{right|</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Sec. 232<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">}}</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham the question of penalty in conducting a quarrying operation in the absence of licence was considered. The Court held that the penalty provided under a Statute takes in only contraventions of that Statute; unless otherwise specifically provided for, to be initiated and proceeded with by the Authorities authorised under that Statute. Authority under the Panchayat Raj Act, when proceeding for violation of that Act, cannot impose the penalty under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act. Absence of a D&amp;O Licence if proceeded with by the competent Authority under the KPR Act is compoundable under the Rules. – Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham - 2016 (5) KHC 893 : 2016 (4) KLT 422 : 2016 (4) KLJ 688.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham the question of penalty in conducting a quarrying operation in the absence of licence was considered. The Court held that the penalty provided under a Statute takes in only contraventions of that Statute; unless otherwise specifically provided for, to be initiated and proceeded with by the Authorities authorised under that Statute. Authority under the Panchayat Raj Act, when proceeding for violation of that Act, cannot impose the penalty under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act. Absence of a D&amp;O Licence if proceeded with by the competent Authority under the KPR Act is compoundable under the Rules. – Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham - 2016 (5) KHC 893 : 2016 (4) KLT 422 : 2016 (4) KLJ 688.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A laundry unit was closed for a while due to financial constraints and subsequently it was planned to revive it. In the instant case, it was held that when the unit has obtained certificate from the Pollution Control Board, permission for resumption of functioning can be given by Secretary for which licensee need not approach Panchayat Council again. - Soorya Retreats and Holidays India Private Limited and Another v. Elamadu Grama Panchayath and Another – 2016 (3) KHC 838.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A laundry unit was closed for a while due to financial constraints and subsequently it was planned to revive it. In the instant case, it was held that when the unit has obtained certificate from the Pollution Control Board, permission for resumption of functioning can be given by Secretary for which licensee need not approach Panchayat Council again. - Soorya Retreats and Holidays India Private Limited and Another v. Elamadu Grama Panchayath and Another – 2016 (3) KHC 838.</div></td></tr> </table>

Sajithomas http://panchayatwiki.lsgkerala.gov.in/index.php?title=Panchayat:Repo18/Law_Manual_Page0308&diff=8818&oldid=prev 2019-01-24T06:51:09Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 06:51, 24 January 2019</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>308</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>308</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>THE KERALA PANCHAYAT LAW MANUAL</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">''</ins>THE KERALA PANCHAYAT LAW MANUAL<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">''</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Sec. 232</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Sec. 232</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham the question of penalty in conducting a quarrying operation in the absence of licence was considered. The Court held that the penalty provided under a Statute takes in only contraventions of that Statute; unless otherwise specifically provided for, to be initiated and proceeded with by the Authorities authorised under that Statute. Authority under the Panchayat Raj Act, when proceeding for violation of that Act, cannot impose the penalty under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act. Absence of a D&amp;O Licence if proceeded with by the competent Authority under the KPR Act is compoundable under the Rules. – Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham - 2016 (5) KHC 893 : 2016 (4) KLT 422 : 2016 (4) KLJ 688.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham the question of penalty in conducting a quarrying operation in the absence of licence was considered. The Court held that the penalty provided under a Statute takes in only contraventions of that Statute; unless otherwise specifically provided for, to be initiated and proceeded with by the Authorities authorised under that Statute. Authority under the Panchayat Raj Act, when proceeding for violation of that Act, cannot impose the penalty under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act. Absence of a D&amp;O Licence if proceeded with by the competent Authority under the KPR Act is compoundable under the Rules. – Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham - 2016 (5) KHC 893 : 2016 (4) KLT 422 : 2016 (4) KLJ 688.</div></td></tr> </table>

Sajithomas http://panchayatwiki.lsgkerala.gov.in/index.php?title=Panchayat:Repo18/Law_Manual_Page0308&diff=8806&oldid=prev 2019-01-24T06:46:06Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 06:46, 24 January 2019</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">{{center|</del></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">308</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">''</del>THE KERALA PANCHAYAT <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">RAJ ACT, 1994'''}}</del></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>THE KERALA PANCHAYAT <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">LAW MANUAL</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">311</del></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Sec. 232</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Panchayat can levy </del>penalty<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">/fine for violation </del>of <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Rules and hence, Tribunal's finding is incorrect</del>. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">It was also </del>held that the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Tribunal may admit </del>a <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">petition submitted within one month after prescribed time limit, if Tribunal is satisfied </del>that <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">there is sufficient reason for not submitting petition within time. Though Rule does not provide for filing of a separate petition </del>for <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">condonation of delay</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">it is always advisable </del>to <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">file a petition to condone delay so that Tribunal can satisfy itself </del>that <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">there was sufficient reason for not submitting petition within time</del>. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Revision filed without an application </del>for <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">condonation </del>of <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">delay</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">was defective </del>and <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">R</del>. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">11 would squarely be applicable to such </del>a <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">situation. Hence. Tribunal was not proper i dismissing </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">revision. Revision petition ought to have been returned giving petitioner an opportunity to re present </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">same along with an application to condone </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">delay</del>. – <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Mallappally Grama Panchavath. Pathanamthitta </del>v. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Zeenath Beevi and Another </del>- <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">2014 </del>(<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">3</del>) KHC <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">32 </del>: <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">2014 </del>(<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">3</del>) KLT <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">161</del>.</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">In Jacob George v. Tomy Abraham the question of </ins>penalty <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">in conducting a quarrying operation in the absence </ins>of <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">licence was considered</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">The Court </ins>held that the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">penalty provided under </ins>a <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Statute takes in only contraventions of </ins>that <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Statute; unless otherwise specifically provided </ins>for, to <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">be initiated and proceeded with by the Authorities authorised under </ins>that <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Statute</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Authority under the Panchayat Raj Act, when proceeding </ins>for <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">violation </ins>of <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">that Act</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">cannot impose the penalty under the Mines and Minerals (Development </ins>and <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Regulation) Act</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Absence of </ins>a <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">D&amp;O Licence if proceeded with by </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">competent Authority under </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">KPR Act is compoundable under </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Rules</ins>. – <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Jacob George </ins>v. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Tomy Abraham </ins>- <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">2016 </ins>(<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">5</ins>) KHC <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">893 </ins>: <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">2016 </ins>(<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">4</ins>) KLT <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">422 : 2016 (4) KLJ 688</ins>.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">In Unnikrishnan </del>A. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">G. V. Commissioner of Excise</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Tvm and Another the question of shifting of toddy shop and effect of Ordinance 62 of 2012 </del>was <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">considered. The Court </del>held that <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">if </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">toddy shop is in existence as on 25/11/2012, Panchayat cannot insist on obtaining a licence under </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">D&amp;O Rules</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">1996, upon shifting </del>of <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">the toddy shop. Notification issued under 1960 Act is superseded when D&amp;O Rules, 1996 were notified. – Unnikrishnan A. G</del>. v. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Commissioner of Excise, Tvm </del>and Another <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">- 2014 </del>(<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">1</del>) KHC <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">140: 2014 (1) KLJ 747</del>.</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">laundry unit was closed for a while due to financial constraints and subsequently it was planned to revive it</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">In the instant case</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">it </ins>was held that <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">when </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unit has obtained certificate from </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Pollution Control Board</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">permission for resumption </ins>of <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">functioning can be given by Secretary for which licensee need not approach Panchayat Council again</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">- Soorya Retreats and Holidays India Private Limited and Another </ins>v. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Elamadu Grama Panchayath </ins>and Another <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">– 2016 </ins>(<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">3</ins>) KHC <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">838</ins>.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Village Panchayat cannot pass a resolution </del>and <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">take a blanket decision </del>that <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">it </del>would not <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">grant </del>any <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">fresh licence for conducting quarries on account of objection </del>by <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">people in </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">locality. Hence</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">an application seeking to establish a factory</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">workplace or other establishments, cannot be summarily rejected. Enquiry contemplated under S.233 </del>is <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">mandatory. For establishing quarry </del>in <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">which mechanical power or electrical power is used, it requires permission from Village Panchayat. Authority </del>of <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Secretary is only </del>to <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">obtain reports from Inspector </del>of <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">factories, District Medical Officer, Divisional Fire Officer and place it before Village </del>Panchayat. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">In an instance coming under R</del>. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">12</del>(3)(<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">d</del>), <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Secretary can issue license in respect </del>of</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Establishment permit and licence - When all Authorities had confirmed that the Unit will not cause any environmental problems </ins>and that <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">there </ins>would not <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">be </ins>any <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">pollution or nuisance to the people at large, provided it functions as per the conditions imposed </ins>by the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">said Authorities</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">then</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">it </ins>is <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">not open for the Panchayat (</ins>in <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">the absence </ins>of <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">other expert materials) </ins>to <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">take a different view and deny licence, overruling the findings </ins>of <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">the Expert Authorities. – Ramapuram Grama </ins>Panchayat <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">v. St</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Basil Industries India (P) Ltd</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">and Others – 2016 </ins>(3) <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">KHC 118: 2016 (2) KLT 219.95</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">s with machinery capacity having less than 5 HP, if he is </del>of <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">opinion </del>that the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">factory or industrial establishment does </del>not <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">cause pollution</del>. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">When S.232 </del>of the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Act gives power on the Secretary </del>of <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Panchayat to issue licence to establish Rules have to be read as if </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">power is vested with the Secretary. The Village Panchayat or </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">President has no Authority in such a case. When an </del>application is <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">filed under S.232 </del>of the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Act, Secretary </del>will be the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">only authority to decide whether </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">license could </del>be <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">granted or not - Notwithstanding </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">same, Village Panchayat has powers </del>to <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">grant or refuse permission under S.233 of </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Act. If an application is submitted under S.232 </del>of the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Act read with D&amp;O Rules, and a permission under S</del>.<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">233 </del>is <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">not required, Secretary is</del></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">In Action Council </ins>(<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">supra</ins>), <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">the Supreme Court had set aside the judgment </ins>of <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">a Division Bench </ins>of <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">this Court reported in Action Council v. Benny Abraham. - 2001 KHC 485 : 2001 (2) KLT 690 : 2001 (2) KLJ 120 : AIR 2002 Ker. 65. Supreme Court felt </ins>that <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">four conditions ascribed by </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Panchayat need </ins>not <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">be interfered with</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">A perusal of para 11 </ins>of the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Division Bench judgment </ins>of <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">this Court would indicate that </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">main reason stated for rejecting </ins>the application <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">for permit </ins>is <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">that there was scarcity </ins>of <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">water in </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">area and therefore it </ins>will <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">not </ins>be <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">possible to use sprinkler as directed by </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Pollution Control Board during summer season and </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">agricultural properties might </ins>be <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">adversely affected and it would include </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">members belonging </ins>to <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">scheduled caste around </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">locality and there was a road around 100 metre </ins>of the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">premises</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">It </ins>is <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">therefore clear that Action Council </ins>(<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">supra</ins>) <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">was decided on its own facts which is also clear from the judgment </ins>of the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Supreme Court </ins>and <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">cannot be treated as </ins>a <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">binding precedent </ins>to <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">form an opinion that in all cases such </ins>a <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">view </ins>is to be taken. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">– Ramapuram </ins>Grama Panchayat v. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">St. Basil Industries India (P) Ltd. and Others – 2016 </ins>(3) KHC <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">118</ins>: <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">2016 </ins>(<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">2</ins>) KLT <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">219</ins>.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">der application and pass appropriate orders. In matters coming under R.12</del>(<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">3)(d</del>) of the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">D&amp;O Rules also power is conferred on the Secretary. However when a composite application is submitted by a person under S.232 </del>and <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">233, </del>a <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">decision </del>to <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">grant </del>a <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">licence or permission under S.233 </del>is to be taken <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">by the Village Panchayat</del>. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">President is given the power to take any action in case of violation of the conditions of licence. - Kadaplamattom </del>Grama Panchayat<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">, Kottayam and Another </del>v. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Johny Roy - 2013 </del>(3) KHC <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">857 </del>: <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">2013 </del>(<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">3</del>) KLT <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">1053 : ILR 2013 (4) Ker. 367</del>. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">BH</del></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Establishment permit -- Objection on ground of density </ins>of <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">population -- Held</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">if there has </ins>to <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">be a valid finding </ins>that <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">industry </ins>is <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">objectionable on account of density of population </ins>in the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">neighbourhood</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">then</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">District Medical Officer ought to have </ins>taken <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">such a </ins>view. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Opinion </ins>of <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Panchayat Sub Committee </ins>is <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">irrelevant, unless it </ins>is <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">constituted with expert bodies nor </ins>have <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">they taken </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">assistance of any experts </ins>in the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">field</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">If</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">after establishing the Unit</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">any pollution is caused</ins>, it is <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">always open for </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Panchayat or </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Kerala State Pollution Control Board, as </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">case may be, </ins>to <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">take appropriate preventive measures </ins>or <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">even revoke </ins>or <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">suspend the licence if there </ins>is <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">noncompliance of </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">statutory provisions. - Ramapuram Grama Panchayat v. St. Basil Industries India (P) Ltd. </ins>and <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Others </ins>- <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">2016 </ins>(<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">3</ins>) <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">KHC 118: 2016 </ins>(<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">2</ins>) <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">KLT 219. Action Council v. Benny Abraham, 2002 KHC 416; Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise v. Krishna Poduval, 2005 KHC 1914; Chandi Prasad v. Jagdish Prasad, 2004 KHC 1184; Deepak Kumar v State of Haryana, 2012 KHC 4150: Gem Granites v. Deputy Superintendent of Police. Singh v</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Union of India and Others, 1979 KHC 591; Krishnan T</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">and Others </ins>v. State of Kerala<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">, 2007 KHC 3367; Mool Shankar Singh v. Regional Manager, PNB and Another, 2004 </ins>(<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">9</ins>) <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">SCC754; Municipal Corporation, Ahmedabad v. Jan Mohammed, 1986 KHC 796; Olga Tellis and Others v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, 1985 KHC 669; Panopharam y. Union of India, 2010 </ins>KHC <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">6221; Paul Industries </ins>(<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">India</ins>) <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">v. Union of India and Others, 2004 KHC 1954; State of Kerala v. Kondottyparambanmoosa, 2008 </ins>(<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">3</ins>) <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">KHC 733; Thomas Thomas v. Kottayam Municipality, 2008 </ins>(<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">4</ins>) <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">KHC 26; Referred to]</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Government have framed the Kerala Panchayat Raj (Licensing </del>of <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Dangerous Trade) Rules</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">1996. As per Section 232, it is for the local body </del>to <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">notify </del>that <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">a particular activity </del>is <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">offensive or dangerous to human health or property and </del>in <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">such a case, without licence from </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Executive Authority</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">no person can use any area for such purposes as are notified</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">without licence. This Court has </del>taken <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">the </del>view <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">that the word "offensive or dangerous to human life or health or property" are not to be construed in their ordinary sense and it need be only activities which are so considered by the Authority (See - Shaji v</del>. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">State </del>of <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Kerala). It </del>is <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">true that a mobile tower </del>is <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">not notified under Section 232 as such. But, we should </del>have <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">regard to </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">words used </del>in <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Section 233 wherein the only indispensable requirements are </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">construction or establishment of any factory</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">workshop or workplace in which</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">no doubt</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">it must be proposed to employ steam power</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">water power or other mechanical power or electrical power. Nothing prevented the Legislature also indicating in Section 233 that </del>it <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">must be a factory, workshop or workplace to which Section 232 </del>is <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">applicable. The conspicuous omission to refer to </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">same and </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">width of </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">language employed in Section 233 leads us </del>to <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">hold that any factory, workshop </del>or <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">workplace, be it included in Section 232 </del>or <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">not, in which it </del>is <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">proposed to employ </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">steam power, water power, mechanical power or electrical power will attract Section 233 and permission must be sought </del>and <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">granted before construction or establishment </del>- (<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Para 41</del>) <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">– Essar Telecom Infrastructure </del>(<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">P</del>) <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Ltd</del>. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">(M/s</del>.<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">) </del>v. State of Kerala <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">- 2011 </del>(<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">2</del>) KHC <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">171 </del>(<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">DB</del>)<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">: 2011 </del>(<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">2</del>) <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">KLT 516 : 2011 </del>(<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">2</del>) <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">KLJ 335.</del></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">The provisions </ins>of the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Act and </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">D &amp; O Rules stand by themselves </ins>and <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">those provisions are not</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">In the conspectus </del>of <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">all </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">decisions, </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">concepts </del>and the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">definitions which we have referred </del>to<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">, we are of the view that </del>a <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">mobile tower would </del>not be <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">a "workplace" within </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">meaning </del>of <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Section 233 </del>of <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">the Panchayat Raj Act </del>or <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Section 448 of the Municipalities Act</del>. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">As already noted, both enactments are of the year 1994 and they are patterned on the provisions of Section 97 of the Kerala Panchayat Act, 1960 and the corresponding provisions of the Municipalities Act, 1960</del>. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">The word "Workshop" is found in the</del></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">previous foot note continued...</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">(4) A Village Panchayat shall be competent to order </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">transfer of an abkari shop from one place </ins>to <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">another within </ins>a <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">period </ins>not <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">exceeding fifteen days as may </ins>be <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">specified in this behalf or to close the shop in </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">interest </ins>of <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">public peace or morality or on grounds </ins>of <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">expediency </ins>or <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">nuisance</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Explanation</ins>.<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">— Abkari shop means a toddy shop or an arrack shop or a foreign liquor shop or a bar attached</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Sajithomas http://panchayatwiki.lsgkerala.gov.in/index.php?title=Panchayat:Repo18/Law_Manual_Page0308&diff=8786&oldid=prev 2019-01-24T06:40:54Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 06:40, 24 January 2019</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>THE KERALA PANCHAYAT RAJ ACT, 1994</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">{{center|</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">''</ins>THE KERALA PANCHAYAT RAJ ACT, 1994<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">'''}}</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>311</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>311</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Panchayat can levy penalty/fine for violation of Rules and hence, Tribunal&#039;s finding is incorrect. It was also held that the Tribunal may admit a petition submitted within one month after prescribed time limit, if Tribunal is satisfied that there is sufficient reason for not submitting petition within time. Though Rule does not provide for filing of a separate petition for condonation of delay, it is always advisable to file a petition to condone delay so that Tribunal can satisfy itself that there was sufficient reason for not submitting petition within time. Revision filed without an application for condonation of delay, was defective and R. 11 would squarely be applicable to such a situation. Hence. Tribunal was not proper i dismissing the revision. Revision petition ought to have been returned giving petitioner an opportunity to re present the same along with an application to condone the delay. – Mallappally Grama Panchavath. Pathanamthitta v. Zeenath Beevi and Another - 2014 (3) KHC 32 : 2014 (3) KLT 161.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Panchayat can levy penalty/fine for violation of Rules and hence, Tribunal&#039;s finding is incorrect. It was also held that the Tribunal may admit a petition submitted within one month after prescribed time limit, if Tribunal is satisfied that there is sufficient reason for not submitting petition within time. Though Rule does not provide for filing of a separate petition for condonation of delay, it is always advisable to file a petition to condone delay so that Tribunal can satisfy itself that there was sufficient reason for not submitting petition within time. Revision filed without an application for condonation of delay, was defective and R. 11 would squarely be applicable to such a situation. Hence. Tribunal was not proper i dismissing the revision. Revision petition ought to have been returned giving petitioner an opportunity to re present the same along with an application to condone the delay. – Mallappally Grama Panchavath. Pathanamthitta v. Zeenath Beevi and Another - 2014 (3) KHC 32 : 2014 (3) KLT 161.</div></td></tr> </table>

Sajithomas